Obama Advisor Lies About Obama's Position Before The Surge

Bob Dole On Scott McClellan No Holds Barred

Bob Dole had this to say in an extraordinary message obtained and authenticated by Politico:

"There are miserable creatures like you in every administration who don’t have the guts to speak up or quit if there are disagreements with the boss or colleagues. No, your type soaks up the benefits of power, revels in the limelight for years, then quits, and spurred on by greed, cashes in with a scathing critique. ...In my nearly 36 years of public service I've known of a few like you," Dole writes, recounting his years representing Kansas in the House and Senate. "No doubt you will 'clean up' as the liberal anti-Bush press will promote your belated concerns with wild enthusiasm. When the money starts rolling in you should donate it to a worthy cause, something like, 'Biting The Hand That Fed Me.' Another thought is to weasel your way back into the White House if a Democrat is elected. That would provide a good set up for a second book deal in a few years."

Dole assures McClellan that he won't read the book -- "because if all these awful things were happening, and perhaps some may have been, you should have spoken up publicly like a man, or quit your cushy, high profile job"

"That would have taken integrity and courage but then you would have had credibility and your complaints could have been aired objectively," Dole concludes. "You’re a hot ticket now but don’t you, deep down, feel like a total ingrate?"

Kerry: On Sept. 11 We Were at Peace

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) believes that on September 11 "we were basically at peace." Asked if al Qaeda was a threat at the time, the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee said, "well yes, obviously they were a threat. But, fundamentally we were not at war at that point in time." I guess we were "basically at peace" on December 7, 1941 as well. This is such an idiotic statement and I don't think I actually need to spell out why. Rock for brains, that's all I need to say.

CIA Cites Big Gains Against Al-Qaeda

"On balance, we are doing pretty well. Near strategic defeat of al-Qaeda in Iraq. Near strategic defeat for al-Qaeda in Saudi Arabia. Significant setbacks for al-Qaeda globally -- and here I'm going to use the word 'ideologically' -- as a lot of the Islamic world pushes back on their form of Islam," CIA Director Michael V. Hayden said. The Washington Post reports that Hayden says Osama bin Laden is losing the battle for hearts and minds in the Islamic world and has largely forfeited its ability to exploit the Iraq war to recruit adherents. This is a turnaround from the CIA assessment two years ago which claime Iraq had become a "cause celebre" for Al-Qaeda. Hayden portrays AL-Qaeda as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. "On balance, we are doing pretty well," he said, ticking down a list of accomplishments: "Near strategic defeat of al-Qaeda in Iraq. Near strategic defeat for al-Qaeda in Saudi Arabia. Significant setbacks for al-Qaeda globally -- and here I'm going to use the word 'ideologically' -- as a lot of the Islamic world pushes back on their form of Islam," he said. Since the start of the year, he said, al-Qaeda's global leadership has lost three senior officers, including two who succumbed "to violence," an apparent reference to Predator strikes that killed terrorist leaders Abu Laith al-Libi and Abu Sulayman al-Jazairi in Pakistan. He also cited a successful blow against "training activity" in the region but offered no details. "Those are the kinds of things that delay and disrupt al-Qaeda's planning," Hayden said.

Hayden warned, however, that progress in Iraq is being undermined by increasing interference by Iran, which he accused of supplying weapons, training and financial assistance to anti-U.S. insurgents. While declining to endorse any particular strategy for dealing with Iran, he described the threat in stark terms. "It is the policy of the Iranian government, approved at the highest levels of that government, to facilitate the killing of American and other coalition forces in Iraq. Period," he said.

Dan Bartlett Responding To Scott McClellan's Book

Hillary Drowning Her Sorrows

Hillary Clinton took time out from her punishing campaign schedule to enjoy a glass of whiskey with a group of journalists. Here are some other pics of Hillary having a couple drinks earlier on the campaign trail. She's a regular party animal:

Obama "Disappointed" With Pfleger

Obama said this in response to videos of Father Pfleger speaking at his church: “As I have traveled this country, I’ve been impressed not by what divides us, but by all that that unites us. That is why I am deeply disappointed in Father Pfleger’s divisive, backward-looking rhetoric, which doesn’t reflect the country I see or the desire of people across America to come together in common cause." Is it not odd that after decades his spiritual mentors are suddenly disappointing and surprising him with their rhetoric? See one of my older posts from today for the videos of Pfleger speaking at Obama's church. There is absolutely no excuse for Obama associating with men like Jeremiah Wright or Michael Pfleger. There is no reasonable justification for Obama's continued membership in the Trinity Church whose new pastor hosts speakers like Pfleger.

Iranian Documents Show Work On The Bomb In 2004

The following is from the AP: "A ranking International Atomic Energy Agency official called Tehran’s possession of a drawing showing how to make part of an atomic warhead 'alarming' Thursday and said the onus is on Iran to prove it had not tried to develop nuclear arms, said diplomats attending a closed briefing...The documents, outlined in an IAEA report forwarded Monday to the U.N. Security Council and agency board members, are part of evidence provided by board member nations to the agency for its investigation into allegations that Iran used the cover of peaceful nuclear activities to conduct research and testing on a nuclear arms program. One, dated January-February 2004 is linked to high explosives testing of the kind that can be used to detonate a nuclear device. Others, dated into January 2004 - and one as late as March 14 of that year - are part of purported evidence that Iran worked on designs of a missile re-entry vehicle that is normally a part of a nuclear delivery system."

These documents are far more than just "alarming." This is evidence of a mounting threat that cannot be ignored. Demanding answers from Iran is futile. There will come a time when it will become inevitable and Iran will have to be confronted. These documents have absolutely no use in a civilian nuclear energy program. Furthermore, the U.S. intelligence community needs to answer some questions about the most recent National Intelligence Estimate that claimed Iran suspended its nuclear program in 2003. These IAEA documents seem to directly contradict the joint assessment of the entire U.S. intelligence community.

Obama Advisor: If Barack Goes To Iraq, It's To Plan Withdrawal

Barack Obama has recently been criticized for not having met with commanders in Iraq while at the same time offering to meet unconditionally with the heads of rogue terrorist regimes. It comes as no surprise that Obama only now says he is considering making a trip to Iraq this summer. In fact, John McCain has offered, as a sign or bipartisanship, to go to Iraq with Obama. Obama has said this would be a political stunt." Spokesman Bill Burton issued a statement from the campaign saying that "John McCain’s proposal is nothing more than a political stunt, and we don’t need any more ‘Mission Accomplished’ banners or walks through Baghdad markets to know that Iraq’s leaders have not made the political progress that was the stated purpose of the surge." Would it not be a show of bipartisanship and support for the troops if Obama could put aside his differences with McCain to make a joint trip to meet with commanders and soldiers? Is this the kind of unity and change that Obama plans to bring to Washington? He is possibly willing to do a solo photo op in Iraq after pressure from the McCain camp, but not willing to go on a join trip with McCain?

Furthermore, an Obama advisor explained that if he were to go to Iraq it would be only for the purpose of planning a withdrawal. He has no interest in listening to whether the commanders on the ground think the progress in Iraq has been sufficient enough to suggest that victory is possible.

Pew Research Shows Liberal Media Bias

The Research study reveals that Obama and Clinton have gotten positive treatment in the media over two-thirds of the time, while the majority of McCain’s coverage was negative. The study says that fully 57% of the narratives studied about McCain were critical in nature. Meanwhile, 69% of the narratives on Obama have been positive, while 67% have been positive on Clinton. See http://www.journalism.org/node/11266 for the full article.

Miami Becoming A Spanish Speaking City

This is from the Associated Press: "In many areas of Miami, Spanish has become the predominant language, replacing English in everyday life. Anyone from Latin America could feel at home on the streets, without having to pronounce a single word in English. In stores, shopkeepers wait on their clients in Spanish. Universities offer programs for Spanish speakers. And in supermarkets, banks, restaurants - even at the post office and government offices - information is given and assistance is offered in Spanish. In Miami, doctors and nurses speak Spanish with their patients and a large portion of advertising is in Spanish. Daily newspapers and radio and television stations cater to the Hispanic public. In the 1950s, it's estimated that more than 80 percent of Miami-Dade County residents were non-Hispanic whites. But in 2006, the Census Bureau estimates that number was only 18.5 percent, and in 2015 it is forecast to be 14 percent. Hispanics now make up about 60 percent. "The Anglo population is leaving," said Juan Clark, a sociology professor at Miami Dade College. "One of the reactions is to emigrate toward the north. They resent the fact that (an American) has to learn Spanish in order to have advantages to work. If one doesn't speak Spanish, it's a disadvantage." According to the Census, 58.5 percent of the county's 2.4 million residents speak Spanish - and half of those say they don't speak English well. English-only speakers make up 27.2 percent of the county's residents...James McCleary, his wife and two children left Miami in 1987 for Vermont, where he is now a farmer. McCleary, 58, said his inability to speak Spanish made it difficult for him to find work - it once took seven months to get hired as a cook...Librarian Martha Phillips, 61, believes those who speak Spanish will continue to have more opportunities and she doesn't think that's necessarily fair. Phillips said she is sorry to see non-Spanish-speakers abandoning Miami, and said she's concerned that the area "will be like a branch of Latin America." "I do resent the fact that people seem to expect that the people who live here adjust to their ways, rather than learning English and making adjustments," she said. "Obviously I don't expect an older person to learn to speak English, but younger people come in and they don't seem to make much of an effort to learn to adapt to this country and they expect us to adapt to them."

Obama's Other Pastor

The picture above was one of the faith testimonials that was featured on Barack Obama's official website. The testimonial of Father Michael Pfleger has not so surprisingly disappeared from the website. This clip of Pfelger was just posted on YouTube and helps explain this situation:

Here is Pfleger defending Farakhan and Wright:

Obama identified Pfleger in a 2004 interview with the Chicago Sun-Times as a key source of spiritual guidance. Pfleger, who practices black liberation theology, is a regular guest speaker at Obama's Trinity church. He was introduced at Sunday's sermon by Obama's new pastor, Rev. Otis Moss III. Pfleger is a regular guest lecturer at Trinity and has been featured a number of times in Wright's Trumpet magazine, which honored Louis Farrakhan. This is the same magazine that Obama gave an exclusive interview to. Obama has also appeared on the cover on a number of occasions. Obama has said in media interviews he will retain his membership in Trinity under Moss, whom he lauded as a "wonderful young pastor." Sane Americans need to know the kind of people and the kind of church that Obama continues to associate with and has been intimately connected with for 20 years. And for good measure, in case you need videos to reinforce a point, here's one more clip of Pfleger paying tribute to Farakhan:

Ari Fleischer On McClellan's Book

Fleischer claims that McClellan had told him he was going to write a very positive book about the administration and that editors tweaked the book. The truth is that so long as McClellan's name is on the front cover this makes no difference.

Video Portrait Of Obama

My amazing little brother Pini showed me this remarkable video recently:

Scott McClellan In His Own Words

Scott McClellan's scathing book against the Bush administration is creating a firestorm. Interestingly, McClellan as Press Secretary sharply criticized those that do what he himself has now just done. First, on January 12, 2004 McClellan responded to Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill's "The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neill," by saying this about the former Treasury head: "It appears to be more about trying to justify personal views and opinions than it does about looking at the results that we are achieving on behalf of the American people."

But wait, it gets even better. This next quote is golden. In response to former Bush White House counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke's "Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror," McClellan had this exchange with a reporter on March 22, 2004:

"McCLELLAN: WELL, WHY, ALL OF A SUDDEN, IF HE HAD ALL THESE GRAVE CONCERNS, DID HE NOT RAISE THESE SOONER? This is one-and-a-half years after he left the administration. AND NOW, ALL OF A SUDDEN, HE'S RAISING THESE GRAVE CONCERNS THAT HE CLAIMS HE HAD. And I think you have to look at some of the facts. One, he is bringing this up in the heat of a presidential campaign. HE HAS WRITTEN A BOOK AND HE CERTAINLY WANTS TO GO OUT THERE AND PROMOTE THAT BOOK. Certainly let's look at the politics of it. His best buddy is Rand Beers, who is the principal foreign policy advisor to Senator Kerry's campaign. The Kerry campaign went out and immediately put these comments up on their website that Mr. Clarke made. ...

Q: Scott, the whole point of his book is he says that he did raise these concerns and he was not listened to by his superiors.

McCLELLAN: Yes, and that's just flat-out wrong. …When someone uses such charged rhetoric that is just not matched by the facts, it's important that we set the record straight. And that's what we're doing. IF YOU LOOK BACK AT HIS PAST COMMENTS AND HIS PAST ACTIONS, THEY CONTRADICT HIS CURRENT RHETORIC. I talked to you all a little bit about that earlier today. Go back and look at exactly what he has said in the past and compare that with what he is saying today."

This is not me, my friends, this is Scott McClellan in his own words. If you are looking for one more quote that seals the deal against old Scotty boy it's this: "I totally agree." When Nancy Pelosi agrees with you then you know you made a wrong turn somewhere.

McCain Rips Obama A New Hole

McCain hammers away at Obama's having not visited Iraq in 2 years and never having met with General Petraeus. He points out that Obama has no compulsion to meet with our leaders on the ground in Iraq, but has promised meetings without preconditions with the Holocaust denier of Iran. McCain has even offered to go with Obama to Iraq to meet with the generals and soldiers and hear what they have to say on the succeses in Iraq. Obama will now end up having to go to Iraq and meet with Petraeus to defuse this criticism.

Op-Eds: Lieberman Vs. Biden

Politics certainly no longer ends at the water's edge. Read Sen. Joe Lieberman's Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121132806884008847.html?mod=Commentary-US This piece by Liebs is a must-read, describing how today's Democrats are not the party he grew up in and how the party has been making a hard leftist blame America turn in foreign affairs.

In response to this article Sen. Joe Biden wrote a reply, which in my opinion underscores the night and day difference between those that understand the nature of the Islamofascist enemy and those who do not: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121150000249615875.html Allow me to focus on one example that only reinforces the point Lieberman was making about today's leading Dems. Biden writes that "Bush has turned a small number of radical groups that hate America into a 10-foot tall existential monster that dictates every move we make...[T]o compare terrorism with an all-encompassing ideology like communism and fascism is evidence of profound confusion." As Biden himself points out in the next paragraph, terrorism is a tactic, not an ideology. What Biden foolishly fails to realize, or is profoundly confused by, is that the comparisons are between Islamofascist Jihadism and those evils of the past. He blames Bush for inflating a threat when the threat is clear and present and hit our shores on 9-11. Further, those that adhere to Bin-Ladenist Salafism are not merely small numbers of radicals, but multitudes in the Middle East and elsewhere that take the form of terror groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, Al-Qaeda, etc., and state-terrorists such as Iran. The very same Iran, by the way, whom Biden says we should be talking to unconditionally. The article portrays exactly the mindset that Lieberman was talking about. If I had to respond to every ignorant statement in that article I would be writing until I was blue in the face.

Czech President Challenges Al Gore To Debate

Czech President Vaclav Klaus has challenged Al Gore to a debate about global warming. Klaus has just had his book on the matter translated into English. It is entitled "Blue Planet in Green Shackles - What Is Endangered: Climate or Freedom?" He said at the National Press Club that "it could be even true that we are now at a stage where mere facts, reason and truths are powerless in the face of the global warming propaganda." Will Gore accept? Not a chance in the whole warming world.

Scott McClellan's Book And The Response

Scott McClellan was President Bush's Press Secretary for almost three years from 2003 to 2006. His new book titled "What Happened" derides the "culture of deception." The book has already roared to Amazon's #1 bestseller. He claims that Bush was using "propaganda" to sell the war, that Rove and Libby had "misled" him about their role in the Valerie Plame issue, and more. If Bush was selling propaganda to the American people, then does that not make McClellan his chief propagandist?

Rove hit back on Tuesday night responding to the former propaganda master on Fox News. Rove sounds pretty convincing in refuting McClellan's claims of secret meetings with Libby which McClellan pyschically determined were about Plame. He said that “this doesn’t sound like Scott. It really doesn’t. Not the Scott McClellan I’ve known for a long time. Second of all, it sounds like somebody else. It sounds like a left-wing blogger. If he had these moral qualms, he should have spoken up about them.” Former White House counselor Dan Bartlett said the book was "total crap," saying that he is "bewildered and puzzled" by "Scott's decision to publicly air these deep misgivings he's never shared privately or publicly" with Bush insiders. "To do it now, through a book, is a mistake," he added. The current Press Secretary Dana Perino said "it is sad. This is not the Scott we knew.”

But all this begs the obvious question that McClellan should answer (which Hannity in fact asks at the end of the Rove interview): If he felt there was so much corruption in the Bush White House, why did he remain Press Secretary for almost three years in a role that required him to be the defender of what he considered to be a corrupt and deceptive administration? Was it the government salary? In truth, there are only two possible reasons. One is that he is cleansing his soul by finally coming out with the truth. Another is that he wants to sell books and controversy does that well. But either way, we need to seriously wonder why McClellan worked for Bush and his advisors for three years as their mouthpiece before coming out with this self-righteous mea culpa. He writes in the book that “history appears poised to confirm what most Americans today have decided: that the decision to invade Iraq was a serious strategic blunder...What I do know is that war should only be waged when necessary, and the Iraq war was not necessary.” He was the Press Secretary for an administration he believed was deceptive when it came to sending American boys into harms way, involving America in an unnecessary war. This is not disagreement or deception over farm subsidies were talking about here. This is war. Yet despite the gravity and impact in lives and treasure of the policies he now disagrees with, he stayed on as Press Secretary instead of resigning and coming to the American people with his late-in-the-game grievances. That to me seems inexcusable.

John McCain Vs. Code Pink Hecklers

This is not the first time John McCain has been heckled by these America hating morons. But it is certainly interesting that conservatives have not been the ones chanting mindless slogans and interrupting Barack Obama. It might have something to do with conservatives knowing when and how to form arguments in full sentences.

Obama Claims Uncle Liberated Auschwitz

Obama's uncle could not have possibly helped liberate Auschwitz unless he was a soldier in the Red Army:

It was not as if he was completely fabricating the story. It now turns out that it was his great-uncle, not his uncle, and the camp was the Ohrdruf subcamp at Buchenwald. I do not understand why Obama would make this mistake when it is well known that the Soviet army liberated Auschwitz. This is for the most part important to point out simply that Obama is not infallible on the stump as the media would have you believe.

Iraqi Violence At Four Year Low

From the LA Times: "The U.S. military said Sunday that the number of attacks by militants in the last week dropped to a level not seen in Iraq since March 2004. About 300 violent incidents were recorded in the seven-day period that ended Friday, down from a weekly high of nearly 1,600 in mid-June last year, according to a chart provided by the military. The announcement appeared aimed at allaying fears that an uprising by militiamen loyal to radical Shiite Muslim cleric Muqtada Sadr could unravel security gains since 28,500 additional American troops were deployed in Iraq in a buildup that reached its height in June. Navy Rear Adm. Patrick Driscoll, a military spokesman, credited the decrease to a series of operations launched by the Iraqi government in the last two months to extend control over parts of the country that have been under the sway of armed Sunni Arab and Shiite militants. They include crackdowns in the southern oil hub of Basra, the northern city of Mosul and Baghdad’s Sadr City district."

Memorial Day

On this Memorial Day we remember the sacrifice of all our soldiers that have given life and limb in the defense of liberty. We must remember that America stormed the beaches of Normandy to fight the evil of Nazism and fought from island to island to defeat Imperialist Japan. We must remember the sacrifices made to defeat the Soviet Communist menace that emerged after World War II. We continue to remember and be grateful for all those Americans who paid the ultimate price fighting tryanny and terror today. God bless America and the American soldier that defends her.

John Wayne's Birthday

Today is the birthday of the last American cowboy. John Wayne was an American icon who came to symbolize what being an American meant. Today we remember a time when unbridled patriotism was not something to be ashamed of. The Duke represents the type of person that no longer exists in the world of today's stars. We remember a time when Hollywood actually had someone you could look up to instead of the loud-mouth morons in tinsel town today. It seems appropriate on Memorial Day to remember the famous Western gunslinger that was the embodiment of the American way. He was the personification of the true American spirit and is still remembered by many as such today. He would have been 101 years old today. Watch these clips of Wayne and you will get a taste of what I mean:

John Wayne "America, Why I Lover Her":

John Wayne's Republic Speech In "The Alamo." If you do not want the context then go to about the seven minute mark:

Sean Hannity's 100 Year Tribute To The Duke:

"Islam Does Not Recognize Boundaries"

Top Pakistani Taliban warlord Baitullah Mehsud on Saturday said jihad, or holy war, would continue in Afghanistan, despite peace negotiations between the militants and Islamabad. “Islam does not recognise boundaries and jihad in Afghanistan will continue,” he told a group of reporters invited to his stronghold of South Waziristan tribal district near the Afghan border. The jihad is global, and they mince no words when it comes to this.

RNC Ad On Obama And Cuba

Clinton: "Remember Bobby Kennedy"

I do not think she meant to link Obama to the RFK assassination. I think the comment has been somewhat blown out of proportion. It certainly was not the smartest thing to say, that's for sure. That is why Hillary has said she regrets making the comment. But it does seem to me like she was referring to the fact that Bobby Kennedy was still campaigning in June. But hey, if the Democrats keep fighting among themselves it only helps John McCain.

Ted Kennedy Diagnosed With Brain Tumor

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy was diagnosed with a cancerous brain tumor Tuesday. The Massachusetts Democrat and liberal icon has served in the Senate since 1962. Kennedy, the Senate's second-longest serving member, was re-elected in 2006 and is not up for election again until 2012. Were he to resign or die in office, state law requires a special election for the seat 145 to 160 days afterward. Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia has held the office since January 3, 1959 and he is the longest-serving member in the history of the Senate. He honored Kennedy today in a tearful speech on the Senate floor. Here are his comments:

Barack Obama: "Lay Off My Wife"

Obama says he does not think it is appropriate for his wife to get attacked for what she has said. He specifically attacks a Tennessee GOP ad that I posted earlier. His outrage is what is outrageous, like every time he whines about being the victim of some attack. The fact of the matter is that Barack Obama was having his wife give stump speeches for him and having her campaign for him. If he is putting her in the political limelight like that then he and she need to be prepared to accept the consequences when people don't like what she says. If you don't want her to be subject to the politics of the campaign, then keep her out of the politics of the campaign. It's just that simple. So the GOP has full rights to run the ads about Michelle's saying she is proud of this country for the first time in her adult life because her husband is running for president. There is nothing inappropriate in doing so. The fawning ObaManiac media surely will not make this point, and that is why I have to.

McCain Explains Why Meeting With Iran Is Just Nuts

Barack Obama has repeatedy stated he would meet with Iran "without preconditions." In fact, in a debate he said he would meet in the first year of his administration with Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, and North Korea. John McCain eloquently explains why Obama is just nuts. Watch it and then try and tell me that Barack is the eloquent one with his hope and change nonsense:

FLASHBACK: Barack promising his meetings with the terrorist crackpots in the Dem debates:

New Bill O'reilly Going Crazy Spoof

WARNING: Graphic Language Content
This clip of Bill O'reilly losing his cool ten years ago is the gift that keeps on giving. This is the third post on the same video. First came the original, then the remix, and now O'reilly's "producer" added in:

McCain Makes Fun Of His "Oldness" On Saturday Night Live

Self-deprecating humor. I don't know whether it actually helps him gain an edge over the age issue, but take a look:

Here is McCain on SNL telling the Dems to take their time in picking a candidate:

FLASHBACK: Here is a decent appearance of McCain's on SNL in 2006:

I think he does a far better job then Hillary does when she makes attempts at comedy. But where is Barack Obama's self-deprecation? Is his highness unwilling to engage in a little SNL humor? Oh yea, that's right, he is far too busy being the hope of all mankind.

And since I am posting SNL stuff here, why not add the Hillary Obama shtick they just did:

RNC Ad On Obama's Anti-Gun Record

Since I'm posting RNC ads I might as well also let you view the ad about Obama's idea for a windfall profits tax on oil companies.

California Gay Marriage Ruling

The AP reports: "A conservative group said it would ask California's Supreme Court to postpone putting its decision legalizing gay marriage into effect until after the fall election. That's when voters will likely have a chance to weigh in on a proposed amendment to California's constitution that would bar same-sex couples from getting married. If the court does not grant the request, gay marriages could begin in California in as little as 30 days, the time it typically takes for the justices' opinions to become final."

I feel I need to weigh in on this ruling:
1. This Is Social Liberalism By Judicial Fiat - This ruling came from none other than the Supreme Court of California, just as Massachusets allowed gay marriage by judicial fiat. Four justices (out of seven) should not be allowed to drastically change the entire definition of an institution that has existed for thousands of years of Judeo-Christian civilization and hundreds of years of American jurisprudence. Proponents of gay marriage cannot convince citizens of a single state to allow for marriage to be for those of the same sex. They have thus implemented the succesful tactic of running to the liberal courts to impose their will on the people. It is only through judicial activism that social liberals are enforcing their visions. This issue should be left up to the people of California to decide.

2. California, Via Popular Vote, Has Already Declared Marriage As Between Men and Women - Proposition 22 was passed reflecting the will of a strong majority of Californians. Voters adopted the measure on March 7, 2000 with 61.4% in favor. The Proposition simply stated, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." Yet the court violated the will of the people. Through democratic action and popular vote the people of the Golden State made their voices heard. I do not think it is the job of courts to redefine marriage especially when the will of the people of the State has been so clearly demonstrated. The people have spoken, let their word stand.

3. California Already Has Civil Unions - The issue in California is simply whether the term marriage should be extended to homosexuals. They already are afforded civil unions. So this is not an issue of obtaining some lost rights that heterosexuals have, but rather one dealing with what marriage itself means. Why judges should decide this is even more complexing.

4. Schwarzenegger Is Dead Wrong - Arnold Schwarzenegger responded to the court ruling saying, “I respect the Court’s decision and as Governor, I will uphold its ruling. . . I will not support an amendment to the constitution that would overturn this state Supreme Court ruling.” This governor has vetoed gay marriage legislation twice specifically because the legislature was acting against the will of the people as expressed in Prop 22. He said both times that he would like the issue left to voters or the courts. Why the legislature should be vetoed but the court supported for doing the same thing, namely violating the will of the people in Prop 22, is quite perplexing. He now fully supports the courts reinterpretation of marriage and further opposes any attempt to give the people a chance to respond through democratic means this November via a vote on a constitutional amendment. He previously acted as if his vetoes were a protection of the people's votes and voice, but now he is against allowing the people to be heard. This makes no sense at all.

5. Marriage Is Not A Civil Right - Marriage is certainly a matter of civil law. But it is not a civil right. The issue is what the government ought to do. The issue at hand is whether the basic assumptions, that in fact predated the law, about what constitutes marriage should be upheld. It is about whether the law is right or wrong. This being the case the issues of equal protection do not apply. Equal protection does not say anything about what constitutes marriage. Equal protection is about the law being applied equally to all. It is about equal rights under the law being afforded to all, not what the law is itself about. If violating equal protection meant not accommodating those who wanted to alter the understood meaning of the institution then anyone could make these ridiculous claims. Caretakers could claim to be married if they so wished. Business partners could claim to be married if it helped the business. Friends who live together could be married. A person should legally be able to have multiple spouses (and at least that has a historical basis in terms of marriage). Anyone could claim to be married to anyone, since apparently violating an individual's idea of what marriage ought to be is considered legal discrimination and a violation of some fundamental right. But the truth is that it cannot, because marriage has a specific definition. The law, based on their underlying assumptions and the definition of marriage, treats all citizens to whom it applies fairly. Blacks get married. Whites get married. Jews get married. Gentiles get married. Immigrants get married. Asians and Latinos get married. Believe it or not, gays can get married too, so long as they marry the opposite sex. But saying that because marriage doesn't include same-sex couples it is therefore a violation of equal protection is absurd. The law does not apply to them in the first place. If one wants to argue that marriage should have a completely new meaning, then a new law is necessary to bring about same-sex marriage. This is because it requires a redefinition of what marriage itself means.
Furthermore, it is nothing short of disgusting when gay activists use the the loaded term "civil right." The term alone brings about memories of the Black civil rights movement. Sometimes they go so far as to compare their cause to that noble movement. Homosexuals are not Blacks in the Jim Crow South. The laws of this land apply equally to gays, they did not apply equally to blacks. There are no signs saying "No Gays Allowed.". To make these comparisons trivializes the history of segregation and racism.

6. This Will Help Republicans In The Election - There is no way this helps Democrats in the 2008 elections. Conservatives will come out in November to try and pass the constitutional amendment in California. Obama will win California but this may force him to spend more money and energy than he may have expected. Furthermore, it puts the gay marriage issue back on the table in November. As a rule, when this issue has been on the table it only helps Republicans. That's because judges are not the only people who get to vote.

Obama Lies About Clapping In Energy Speech; Continues To Attack Bush For Opposing Appeasement

This may be insignificant in the larger scheme of things but it begs the questions: What is it about Barack Obama, along with Hillary and her Tuzla lie for that matter, that he feels he needs to lie about small things to make points in his speeches? Can't he make his point about energy policy without having to resort to fabricated stories about clapping? Could Hillary not make her point about experience without fantasies of darting bullets in Bosnia? Does a tendency to lie about the little things demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness on the larger issues?

Obama has lied to us before. He lied about what he knew about his pastor, trying to dupe the American people at first saying he never heard Wright say anything controversial, then later saying he did know there were controversies, and only later when political expediency demanded it did he denounce Wright. A pattern of lying is not a good thing either, folks.

Obama continues to pretend he is being attacked by what Bush said in the Knesset saying that it was a "dishonest, divisive attacks of the sort that we've seen out of George Bush and John McCain over the last couple days." Now here comes the clincher: "They aren't telling you the truth. They are trying to fool you and scare you because they can't win a foreign policy debate on the merits. But it's not going to work. Not this time, not this year." I laugh at Obama claiming Bush or McCain are trying to fool people. What they believe is clear. It is Obama that hides his true feelings behind empty slogans. It is Obama that tried fooling us when it came to his pastor. It is Obama who has used the tactic (succesfully, might I add) of pretending to be attacked when there was no attack to begin with. He did it with a member of his own party when he went after Geraldine Ferraro for being racist. He claimed the the tapes of Wright were some sort of conspiritorial attack when what they were was his own pastor's words. He then says that he has stated "over and over again that I will not negotiate with terrorists like Hamas." Is Mahmoud Ahmadenijad not a terrorist "like Hamas?" He constantly, to the point that we're all pretty immune to it at this point, calls for Israel's destruction. This is like Hamas. But he is like Hamas in word as well as in deed. Iran is funding Hamas, Hezbollah, and Taliban elements. They are funding and supplying weapons to Jihadists in Iraq that have killed Americans. Yet Obama has said in no uncertain terms that he would talk with Iran without any preconditions. So Obama's "like Hamas" semantics are convenient, but not really logical at all. If McCain attacks him on his inconsistency, on his naivete, on his policy of appeasement, that is not fooling anyone. In fact, it is probably educating everyone.

Obama
by krs601

Unlike Michelle Obama, People Of Tennessee Are Proud Americans

Bill O'reilly Flips Out Remix

WARNING: Graphic language content.
Sorry, but there is no getting around it. I just had to post the remix:

Bush Blasts Appeasement At Knesset; Dems Go Beserk

Take a listen to some of Bush's comments in support of Israel at the Knesset:


Naturally, the pro-appeasement Democrats just went beserk. Instead of commending Bush's sentiments, Obama (with his talk of appeasing Iran) said that Bush used the speech "to the Knesset on the 6Oth anniversary of Israel's independence to launch a false political attack." But you can't blame Obama, he just wants to live up to his Hamas endorsement. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thursday that Bush's remarks were "beneath the dignity of the office of the president and unworthy of our representation" at the celebration of Israel's 60th anniversary. Senator Joe Biden said, “This is bullshit, this is malarkey. This is outrageous, for the president of the United States to go to a foreign country, to sit in the Knesset ... and make this kind of ridiculous statement.” Hillary Clinton said Bush's statement was "offensive and outrageous." The appeasement Democrats led by Barack Hussein Obama can't even let the president support Israel without going crazy. The president did not even mention Obama or the Democrats, he merely and rightly condemned appeasement in a speech to the Israeli Knesset. But the party of surrender, of cutting and running, of talking to the mad Mullahs of Iran, of defeat and retreat just could not handle Bush's comments on appeasement. Hey Dems: Me thinks thou doth protest too much.

Meanwhile, Palestinians protested across the West Bank and Gaza on the 60th anniversary of the Nakba, or "catastrophe," of the birth of Israel on Thursday.

Reporter Insulted After Obama Calls Her "Sweetie"

Grandfather of Hamas TV Bunny Assud Insists Tel Aviv Was a Palestinian City

Delusions that are necessary to convince the new generation of Jihadists to conquer Tel Aviv. I also find it odd that the grandfather of a bunny is an old Arab man. Unlike Donald Duck who has three duck sons and anUncle scrooge McDuck, this rabbit apparently has an old man as a grandpa. But hey, I guess there's strange breeding going on over there. See http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1766.htm
Tel Aviv 1909: